Exactly what I said about Putin. Rouhani, the worst President ever for Iran (except maybe the current one), was in on this stupid agreement to allow terrorist strongholds to remain in Syria. I think that Putin and the US are in on this together after what just happened in Syria in December. Russia did not enter Syria to save it from the US backed terrorists but entered to protect Israel. Prove me wrong.
You're right about Russia's protectionism of Israel, they don't even bother to hide it and I wrote earlier several times and as recently as a few days ago about when Netanyahu instructed Putin not to hand over the S300 Syria bought from Russia back in 2010, months before the Syrian version of the Arab Spring started and for how long Russia was stalling its contribution to help terminate over 14000 terrorists in Syria who came from Russian republics, if not to help an ally when in need, if not to help humanity against terrorism that would and had threatened and targeted Russian homeland.
100% Syria was never allowed to defend itself from Israeli attacks after Russia entered "against" the US backed terrorist insurgency. Russia was only there to protect Israel and it's own interests in the region. There are some that say that Putin is responsible for the death of the Donbass commanders in the terrorist attacks that killed them (i.e., Givi and Motorola). I am starting to believe that is the truth.
Arabi Sour; Syria News another western sponsored propaganda site?
Let's briefly consider only some of what is being spewed.
*Erdogan "faithful servant " zionest project!? Not hardly on the contrary besides Iran Erdogan may pose the greatest obstacle to the US/zionest project as the Turkmen is seeking aspirations of a greater Ottoman empire.
* The Astana Format:
Indeed diplomatic agreements were broken allowing time for resurgence but it also provided a measure of temporary calm for Damascus And time Allowing Rus to focus attention on the Ukrainian file... including solidifying diplomatic relations with Iran, apposed to a potential military confrontation with Nato member Turkey.
BRICS:
Brics is a non binding economic pack among member states. It is Not a security pack with the Russian Federation. What the article stated is non sense.
*Russian policy on west Asia specifically Syria was to assist Iran and Syria combating terrorists elements spreading And spreading to Russian borders that were by then already awash with nazi para military. Putin made it very clear then and still today in his many statements that his primary concern is protecting the Russia Homeland and the Russian peoples. Everyone wants the mighty Rus to be the world policeman providing Russian military personnel everywhere with unlimited security resources, but as Syria has now shown the geopolitical chessboard is not opened to amateur speculation as the writer so clearly has shown to be.
Syria News has been consistent for the past 13.5 years, where have you been I have no clue.
Let's start debunking some of your ideological love of Erdogan: How is Turkey an obstacle of any size let alone one of the 'greatest obstacles' to the US/Zionist project when Erdogan himself said in a TV interview that George W. Bush indoctrinated him to have a leading role in the Greater Israel project in which he had been faithful to ever since.
And since Turkey is an obstacle to the US/Zionist project, what is the best way to stop that project? By weakening the Axis of Resistance? By providing Israel with the fuel its jets need to bomb the Axis, especially contributing to the genocide in Gaza? By doubling the trade with Israel severalfold while flooding Syria with thousands of terrorists every month nonstop? We do not judge Erdogan by his empty threats against Israel, we judge him by his heinous acts against Israel's enemies.
Your argument about the Astana Format lacks the chronology aspect, the Astana agreements were meant to stop the Syrian Arab Army's advance in Idlib back in 2019 thus giving the terrorists and their sponsors the time to rearm and augment them with more terrorists while daily violating the ceasefire. Mr. Putin during that time was sleeping in the honey of his 'Western Partners' promises which he admitted several times that he regrets trusting them in the Minsk Accords.
You misread the sentence in the article about the BRICS arrangement so I copied it here again for you: "The signal to the remaining allies and the community of nations united in BRICS could therefore be something like this: Take what you can from Russia, but don’t trust the Kremlin an inch!"
See the 'and' between remaining allies 'and' the community of nations united in BRICS? That means they are two separate things, the allies and the community of nations, and yes they are united under many principles including non-interfering in other internal affairs which aspiring members of BRICS like Turkey constantly breached in Syria and Iraq, at least, not to mention in Ukraine, Armenia, and to help Israel against Gaza. And the principle of not engaging in sanctions against other countries which again some of the community of BRICS aspiring members are engaged in like Turkey and others.
Russian policy under Mr. Putin was to freeze conflicts until conflicts visited his borders in Ukraine. He had a shortsighted policy in defending Russia's homeland against terrorists as he empowered the terrorists in Syria for instance, and not to forget how the Russian FSB allowed over 14000 terrorists from Russian republics to move freely into Syria through several borders, dumping them away of the homeland only to get them more organized later on and snap back.
I understand your enthusiasm toward Russia, we called Putin 'Abu Ali Putin' as a supportive nickname when he finally came to aid Syria from those terrorists who are sponsored by the same camp aiming to use them against Russia's homeland, that was before we saw Russia's support of Syria's enemies on the account of the Syrian people, namely Turkey, Israel, and Qatar.
Exactly what I said about Putin. Rouhani, the worst President ever for Iran (except maybe the current one), was in on this stupid agreement to allow terrorist strongholds to remain in Syria. I think that Putin and the US are in on this together after what just happened in Syria in December. Russia did not enter Syria to save it from the US backed terrorists but entered to protect Israel. Prove me wrong.
You're right about Russia's protectionism of Israel, they don't even bother to hide it and I wrote earlier several times and as recently as a few days ago about when Netanyahu instructed Putin not to hand over the S300 Syria bought from Russia back in 2010, months before the Syrian version of the Arab Spring started and for how long Russia was stalling its contribution to help terminate over 14000 terrorists in Syria who came from Russian republics, if not to help an ally when in need, if not to help humanity against terrorism that would and had threatened and targeted Russian homeland.
100% Syria was never allowed to defend itself from Israeli attacks after Russia entered "against" the US backed terrorist insurgency. Russia was only there to protect Israel and it's own interests in the region. There are some that say that Putin is responsible for the death of the Donbass commanders in the terrorist attacks that killed them (i.e., Givi and Motorola). I am starting to believe that is the truth.
Arabi Sour; Syria News another western sponsored propaganda site?
Let's briefly consider only some of what is being spewed.
*Erdogan "faithful servant " zionest project!? Not hardly on the contrary besides Iran Erdogan may pose the greatest obstacle to the US/zionest project as the Turkmen is seeking aspirations of a greater Ottoman empire.
* The Astana Format:
Indeed diplomatic agreements were broken allowing time for resurgence but it also provided a measure of temporary calm for Damascus And time Allowing Rus to focus attention on the Ukrainian file... including solidifying diplomatic relations with Iran, apposed to a potential military confrontation with Nato member Turkey.
BRICS:
Brics is a non binding economic pack among member states. It is Not a security pack with the Russian Federation. What the article stated is non sense.
*Russian policy on west Asia specifically Syria was to assist Iran and Syria combating terrorists elements spreading And spreading to Russian borders that were by then already awash with nazi para military. Putin made it very clear then and still today in his many statements that his primary concern is protecting the Russia Homeland and the Russian peoples. Everyone wants the mighty Rus to be the world policeman providing Russian military personnel everywhere with unlimited security resources, but as Syria has now shown the geopolitical chessboard is not opened to amateur speculation as the writer so clearly has shown to be.
Syria News has been consistent for the past 13.5 years, where have you been I have no clue.
Let's start debunking some of your ideological love of Erdogan: How is Turkey an obstacle of any size let alone one of the 'greatest obstacles' to the US/Zionist project when Erdogan himself said in a TV interview that George W. Bush indoctrinated him to have a leading role in the Greater Israel project in which he had been faithful to ever since.
Watch Erdogan say that: https://syrianews.cc/erdogan-tool-hands-zionists/
And since Turkey is an obstacle to the US/Zionist project, what is the best way to stop that project? By weakening the Axis of Resistance? By providing Israel with the fuel its jets need to bomb the Axis, especially contributing to the genocide in Gaza? By doubling the trade with Israel severalfold while flooding Syria with thousands of terrorists every month nonstop? We do not judge Erdogan by his empty threats against Israel, we judge him by his heinous acts against Israel's enemies.
Your argument about the Astana Format lacks the chronology aspect, the Astana agreements were meant to stop the Syrian Arab Army's advance in Idlib back in 2019 thus giving the terrorists and their sponsors the time to rearm and augment them with more terrorists while daily violating the ceasefire. Mr. Putin during that time was sleeping in the honey of his 'Western Partners' promises which he admitted several times that he regrets trusting them in the Minsk Accords.
You misread the sentence in the article about the BRICS arrangement so I copied it here again for you: "The signal to the remaining allies and the community of nations united in BRICS could therefore be something like this: Take what you can from Russia, but don’t trust the Kremlin an inch!"
See the 'and' between remaining allies 'and' the community of nations united in BRICS? That means they are two separate things, the allies and the community of nations, and yes they are united under many principles including non-interfering in other internal affairs which aspiring members of BRICS like Turkey constantly breached in Syria and Iraq, at least, not to mention in Ukraine, Armenia, and to help Israel against Gaza. And the principle of not engaging in sanctions against other countries which again some of the community of BRICS aspiring members are engaged in like Turkey and others.
Russian policy under Mr. Putin was to freeze conflicts until conflicts visited his borders in Ukraine. He had a shortsighted policy in defending Russia's homeland against terrorists as he empowered the terrorists in Syria for instance, and not to forget how the Russian FSB allowed over 14000 terrorists from Russian republics to move freely into Syria through several borders, dumping them away of the homeland only to get them more organized later on and snap back.
I invite you to watch what the Chechen Military Police commander under the Russian Army says when deployed in Aleppo in the short video embedded in this article: https://syrianews.cc/syrian-arab-army-killed-5000-chechen-terrorsits-gifted-russia-4200/
I understand your enthusiasm toward Russia, we called Putin 'Abu Ali Putin' as a supportive nickname when he finally came to aid Syria from those terrorists who are sponsored by the same camp aiming to use them against Russia's homeland, that was before we saw Russia's support of Syria's enemies on the account of the Syrian people, namely Turkey, Israel, and Qatar.